I
really, really wanted to like Mitt Romney. I did like his dad whom I believed
to be a man of conviction. George Romney was one of the last Republicans to
support the Civil Rights movement when the party's ideology was switching
driven by Nixon's “Southern Strategy”
(Nixon canvassed the Southern vote with a veiled appeal to white voters using
phrases like “law-and-order” to counter the push from Democrats to support
civil rights). Mitt, like his father, was a great moderate Republican Governor
and I fully supported Romneycare.
Yesterday
I read something from a Republican that made a lot of sense in explaining
Romney’s recent loss. Representative Pete Sessions explained:
“Mitt Romney appeared like a kid who
showed up for his science project and the teacher said, ‘Explain it,’ and Mitt
couldn’t do it. His ‘dad,’ Paul Ryan, explained it to him, but Mitt didn’t get
it. … That’s why we lost the last election.”
Now
with all due respect to Representative Sessions for coming up with his science
analogy, Paul Ryan is not Mitt’s dad.
George Romney is. Mitt was trying to follow his dad’s footsteps running
for President driven through public service and some vindication for his
father. Mitt outpaced his father by winning his party’s nomination which his
dad had failed to do. George’s
presidential failure came after his statement about “brainwashing” by generals
in Vietnam, who tried hard to convince him that the war was winnable. It wasn’t
a winning position for the senior Romney and he lost to Nixon.
Mitt
did seem like a kid at a Science Fair, however, whose dad (George, not Ryan)
had groomed him for public service, but somehow Mitt never understood his
father’s core direction. This might sound harsh, but how does one explain his
conversion from a moderate Republican into the neo-con, tea-party disciple that
didn’t fit the George Romney mantle? His flawed strategy peaked in the first
debate but was flooded with inconsistencies as the election moved forward.
History
– and maybe me – can be a harsh judge. Eventually the Republicans will figure
out who they are and understand the pivotal middle ground. In the meantime, it is refreshing to have
them talking about science.
[cross-posted at MormonDems.com]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome. Feel free to disagree as many do. You can even be passionate (in moderation). Comments that contain offensive language, too many caps, conspiracy theories, gratuitous Mormon bashing, personal attacks on others who comment, or commercial solicitations- I send to spam. This is a troll-free zone. Charity always!